QuantCalcQuantCalcResearch
All studiesWithdrawal Calculator

One Year or Two? What Splitting a Large IRA Withdrawal Across December and January Saves, and When It Costs More

Published 2026-10-28. Tax year 2026 (the return filed in early 2027).

Is it cheaper to split a large IRA withdrawal across two tax years?

Usually, but not always. Across 16 cases (four retiree households, withdrawals of $30,000, $60,000, $100,000, $200,000), splitting the withdrawal evenly across two tax years cut federal tax plus the IRMAA surcharge in 13 and raised it in 2. The largest saving was $11,056 (Couple, 68 and 66: $42,000 Social Security + $30,000 IRA, $200,000); the largest extra cost was $1,691 (Couple, 68 and 66: $42,000 Social Security + $30,000 IRA, $60,000). Splitting can cost more when Social Security is involved: taking it all at once leaves the other year's income low, so most of that year's benefit stays untaxed, and no more than 85% of the benefit is ever taxable in the big year; splitting makes the benefit taxable in both years. In the costliest case, $71,400 of Social Security was taxable over the two years when split, against $47,650 when taken at once.

Key numbers
Cases computed4 households × 4 amounts = 16 federal; 816 with state tax
Splitting lowers federal tax13 of 16
Splitting raises federal tax2 of 16
Splitting lowers federal tax + IRMAA13 of 16
Largest saving from splitting (federal + IRMAA)$11,056 (Couple, 68 and 66: $42,000 Social Security + $30,000 IRA, $200,000)
Largest extra cost of splitting (federal + IRMAA)$1,691 (Couple, 68 and 66: $42,000 Social Security + $30,000 IRA, $60,000)
Cases where splitting lowers / raises the IRMAA surcharge7 / 1 of 16
State cases where splitting costs more in total104 of 816

Price your own withdrawal: the 2026 IRA and 401(k) withdrawal calculator
Free: the federal and state tax on your withdrawal, on your own income.

The households and the question

Each household has its usual year of income and needs a one-off extra amount from a traditional IRA. Option A takes it all in one tax year; option B takes half on or before December 31 and half from January 1, so it lands on two returns (an IRA distribution is taxed in the year it is paid: IRC §408(d)(1)). Both years are priced on the 2026 law, so the comparison is in today's dollars; the IRMAA surcharge is the one each year's MAGI sets two years later, on the 2026 tiers (SSA POMS HI 01101.020).

Federal tax and IRMAA on the withdrawal: all in one year vs half in each of two years
Household: withdrawalFederal tax, one yearFederal tax, splitFederal saved by splittingIRMAA saved by splittingFederal + IRMAA saved
S1: $30,000$5,305$5,846−$541$0−$541
S1: $60,000$11,823$10,610$1,213$0$1,213
S1: $100,000$21,440$18,982$2,458$2,885$5,343
S1: $200,000$47,576$42,880$4,696$586$5,282
S2: $30,000$6,996$6,996$0$0$0
S2: $60,000$14,215$13,992$223$2,885$3,107
S2: $100,000$24,359$23,341$1,018$2,323$3,341
S2: $200,000$53,026$48,718$4,308−$2,885$1,423
S3: $30,000$5,291$4,446$845$0$845
S3: $60,000$8,891$10,582−$1,691$0−$1,691
S3: $100,000$15,842$15,382$460$0$460
S3: $200,000$40,444$31,685$8,759$2,297$11,056
S4: $30,000$4,083$3,600$483$0$483
S4: $60,000$11,475$8,166$3,309$0$3,309
S4: $100,000$21,331$18,022$3,309$2,297$5,606
S4: $200,000$45,569$42,662$2,907$1,176$4,083

A negative saving means splitting costs more. "Federal tax, one year" and "split" are the extra federal tax over the two years against two years without the withdrawal.

Why splitting can cost more

Up to 85% of Social Security benefits are taxable, and the taxable part grows with other income between two thresholds (IRC §86; IRS Publication 915). No more than 85% of the benefit is ever taxable, however large the withdrawal. So taking the whole amount in one year caps the benefit's exposure in that year and leaves the other year's income low, with most of its benefit untaxed; splitting raises both years' income and can make the benefit taxable in both. Splitting made more Social Security taxable over the two years in 8 of the 16 cases; in Couple, 68 and 66: $42,000 Social Security + $30,000 IRA, $60,000 it was $71,400 against $47,650. Against that, splitting keeps more of the withdrawal in lower brackets, which wins as the amount grows: the saving from splitting was largest at $200,000 (Couple, 68 and 66: $42,000 Social Security + $30,000 IRA, $200,000).

IRMAA works the other way: a surcharge tier is reached by one year's MAGI, so halving the peak keeps a household under a floor it would otherwise cross. Splitting lowered the surcharge in 7 of the 16 cases (the 2026 tiers). It raised it in 1 (Single, 72: $32,000 Social Security + $50,000 IRA, $200,000): an amount so large that each half still crosses a floor puts two years over it instead of one.

With state tax, every state

Each state adds its own brackets, deductions and retirement exclusions to the same two years. Splitting changed the state tax by more than 50 cents in 495 of the 816 state cases.

Federal + state + IRMAA saved by splitting: the spread over the 51 jurisdictions
Household: withdrawalStates taxing the withdrawalMedian state tax savedStates where splitting savesStates where it costs moreLowest total savingHighest total saving
S1: $30,00033$35249−$576$312
S1: $60,00036$94510$1,026$5,343
S1: $100,00038$157510$3,858$7,885
S1: $200,00038$63510$3,484$11,958
S2: $30,00036$0184−$2,055$1,330
S2: $60,00038$0510$735$5,304
S2: $100,00038$0510$1,063$8,185
S2: $200,00038$0510$97$4,075
S3: $30,00031$0510$715$2,040
S3: $60,00033$34249−$2,499$1,565
S3: $100,00035$366510$260$4,302
S3: $200,00038$166510$9,056$16,626
S4: $30,00035$0492−$1,935$2,537
S4: $60,00036$0510$891$4,454
S4: $100,00038$0510$3,226$7,991
S4: $200,00038$0510$1,981$9,172
Two cases in every state: Couple, 68 and 66: $42,000 Social Security + $30,000 IRA, $200,000 (the largest saving) and Couple, 68 and 66: $42,000 Social Security + $30,000 IRA, $60,000 (the largest extra cost)
StateS3 $200,000: state savedS3 $200,000: total savedS3 $60,000: state savedS3 $60,000: total saved
Alabama−$612$10,444−$90−$1,781
Alaska$0$11,056$0−$1,691
Arizona$666$11,722$460−$1,231
Arkansas$935$11,991$546−$1,145
California$5,435$16,491$975−$716
Colorado$1,673$12,729$1,313−$378
Connecticut−$625$10,431$3,256$1,565
Delaware$2,338$13,394$1,256−$435
District of Columbia$3,872$14,928$1,106−$585
Florida$0$11,056$0−$1,691
Georgia$3,493$14,549$0−$1,691
Hawaii$1,634$12,690$967−$724
Idaho$1,887$12,943$1,451−$240
Illinois$0$11,056$0−$1,691
Indiana$0$11,056$0−$1,691
Iowa$0$11,056$0−$1,691
Kansas$166$11,222$61−$1,630
Kentucky$1,443$12,499$657−$1,034
Louisiana$610$11,666$610−$1,081
Maine$5,310$16,366$0−$1,691
Maryland−$304$10,752$1,158−$533
Massachusetts−$1$11,055−$1−$1,692
Michigan$3,527$14,582$0−$1,691
Minnesota−$1,016$10,040$1,016−$675
Mississippi$0$11,056$0−$1,691
Missouri$619$11,675$694−$997
Montana$996$12,052−$309−$2,000
Nebraska$549$11,605$328−$1,363
Nevada$0$11,056$0−$1,691
New Hampshire$0$11,056$0−$1,691
New Jersey$5,570$16,626$0−$1,691
New Mexico−$667$10,389$656−$1,035
New York$2,593$13,649$1,192−$499
North Carolina$0$11,056$0−$1,691
North Dakota$1,866$12,922$0−$1,691
Ohio−$319$10,737$34−$1,657
Oklahoma$639$11,695$640−$1,051
Oregon$1,608$12,664$178−$1,513
Pennsylvania$0$11,056$0−$1,691
Rhode Island$346$11,402−$447−$2,138
South Carolina$1,658$12,714$1,076−$615
South Dakota$0$11,056$0−$1,691
Tennessee$0$11,056$0−$1,691
Texas$0$11,056$0−$1,691
Utah−$2,000$9,056$1,035−$656
Vermont$686$11,742−$808−$2,499
Virginia−$3$11,053$1,952$261
Washington$0$11,056$0−$1,691
West Virginia$154$11,210$123−$1,568
Wisconsin$1,717$12,772$1,147−$544
Wyoming$0$11,056$0−$1,691

For Couple, 68 and 66: $42,000 Social Security + $30,000 IRA, $200,000 the total saving from splitting is largest in New Jersey ($16,626). For Couple, 68 and 66: $42,000 Social Security + $30,000 IRA, $60,000, splitting costs more in 49 of the 51 jurisdictions.

Two years is a small window. The same arithmetic decides how to spread Roth conversions and IRA withdrawals over a whole retirement: the Social Security range, the senior deduction and the IRMAA floors move with every year's income. The Roth Conversion Planner ($49, one payment) builds the year-by-year plan with the federal tax, the state tax and IRMAA in each year →

Download the data

Every case on this page, with its inputs: ira-withdrawal-one-year-or-two-2026.csv (the 16 federal + IRMAA cases) · ira-withdrawal-one-year-or-two-2026-states.csv (the 816 cases with state tax) · ira-withdrawal-one-year-or-two-2026.json (both, CC0). Dollar amounts in USD; a negative saving means splitting costs more.

Questions

Is it better to take a large IRA withdrawal in one year or split it over two?
It depends on the rest of your income. In 13 of the 16 cases computed here, splitting cut federal tax plus the IRMAA surcharge, by up to $11,056. In 2 it cost more, by up to $1,691: retirees whose Social Security is partly taxable can pay more by splitting.
Why would splitting an IRA withdrawal cost more tax?
Because of how Social Security is taxed. No more than 85% of the benefit is taxable however large the withdrawal, so taking it all in one year caps that year and leaves the other year low, with most of its benefit untaxed. Two half-size withdrawals raise both years and can make the benefit taxable in both.
Does splitting a withdrawal help with IRMAA?
Usually: IRMAA tiers read one year's MAGI, so a smaller peak can stay under a tier floor. Splitting lowered the surcharge in 7 of the 16 cases here and raised it in 1, where each half was still large enough to cross a floor, so two years paid it instead of one. The surcharge is paid two years after the income year.
Does the state I live in change the answer?
Sometimes. Splitting cost more in total (federal, state and IRMAA) in 104 of the 816 household-state cases.

Method and sources

Every figure was computed by QuantCalc's open tax engines (federal 2.5.1, state 1.21.2) and the IRMAA module through the household module the free 401(k) withdrawal calculator runs, then recomputed by the C engines behind the federal and state tax APIs, from independently written requests, agreeing to the cent. For each household and amount W: one year = tax(usual income + W) + tax(usual income); split = 2 × tax(usual income + W/2); the saving is one year minus split, for the federal tax, the state tax and the annual IRMAA surcharge (Part B + Part D for each person 65 or older). Joint returns split the IRA money evenly between the spouses on the state return. The sources of the rules this study leans on:

What is not modelled

An estimate, not tax advice. These are computed examples for the 2026 tax year from QuantCalc's open tax engines (federal 2.5.1, state 1.21.2). Your own return depends on facts these examples do not include. Check any decision with your tax preparer before acting.

Cite this research study

QuantCalc Research (2026). Split a Large IRA Withdrawal Across Two Tax Years or Take It at Once? Federal, Every State and IRMAA (2026). https://quantcalc.app/research/ira-withdrawal-one-year-or-two-2026/ (accessed <date>).

BibTeX
@misc{quantcalc2026splitalargeirawithdrawalacrosstwotaxyear,
  title  = {Split a Large IRA Withdrawal Across Two Tax Years or Take It at Once? Federal, Every State and IRMAA (2026)},
  author = {{QuantCalc Research}},
  year   = {2026},
  url    = {https://quantcalc.app/research/ira-withdrawal-one-year-or-two-2026/},
  note   = {Accessed <date>}
}

Machine-readable citation metadata (schema.org identifier and citation fields) is embedded in this page's JSON-LD, at the stable identifier https://quantcalc.app/research/ira-withdrawal-one-year-or-two-2026/.